Wharton v. County of Nassau et al
Case Number: 2:2010cv00265
Filed: January 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER re 146 Settlement Dispute. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, this Court finds that Plaintiff has, as required by the parties' agreed upon settlement agreement, actually retired from his position with the County. He has don e so by submission of the appropriate paper work, as set forth in the parties' agreement. At this point, having filed the precise submissions required by the settlement agreement, Plaintiff is entitled to payment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 12/6/2016. (Demosthenous, Dina)
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative, for a new trial, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED solely with respect to defendant Ostermann, and the jury's $15,000 punitive damages award issued against her is VACATED. In addition, Defendan ts' motion for a new trial concerning compensatory damages will be granted unless Wharton agrees to a remitter reducing the compensatory damages award to $60,000. Wharton is therefore directed to inform the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum & Order whether he will consent to a remitter of the total damages award (including the uncontested $30,000 punitive damages award) from $420,000 to $90,000. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/30/2015. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 72 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's: (1) negligence claim; (2) Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims based upon time-b arred events; (3) Title VII discrimination claims based on Plaintiff's requests for time off, requests for use of the inmate chapels, and failure to promote because such events are not adverse employment actions sufficient to support a discrimin ation claim; (4) Title VII claim for racial discrimination; (5) Title VII retaliation claim based upon denial of inmate chapels and actions with respect to the EAP Unit, as these are not adverse actions sufficient to support a retaliation claim; (6) state law claims against the County and the Department for Plaintiff's failure to timely serve a notice of claim; (7) hostile work environment claim under the NYSHRL; and state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendan ts' motion is otherwise DENIED. In accordance with this Court's Order dated 5/29/12 [D.E.62], the parties shall file a Joint Pre-Trial Order within 21 days of the date of this Order. This matter is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson to resolve any remaining pretrial issues and to determine whether this action is ready for trial. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/10/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie) (Main Document 79 replaced on 9/10/2013) (Valle, Christine).
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER denying 54 Motion to Compel; denying 55 Motion to Compel: Plaintiff's motion to compel is denied as untimely, as well as being without merit. Defendants' cross-motion to compel, contained in their opposition to plaintiff's letter motion, is denied for the same reasons and is also denied as a prohibited cross-motion in a letter application. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/29/2012. (Minerva, Deanna)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is DENIED and Defendants' Answer is DEEMED TIMELY FILED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/22/10. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wharton v. County of Nassau et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?