Hemans v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center et al
| Arnold Hemans |
| Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Ilene Manheimer, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Care, Inc., Joseph Rivera and Jerry Ryan |
| 2:2010cv01158 |
| March 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants' motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), is granted in part and denie d in part. With respect to the corporate defendants, the motion is denied as to (1) the federal and state age discrimination claims relating to the three alleged suspensions; (2) the state retaliation claim arising from the alleged 2007 protected ac tivity; and (3) the federal and state hostile work environment claims. With respect to the individual defendants, the motion to dismiss the state claim against them under Section Section 296 is denied. The motion is granted as to all other claims. The parties shall proceed with discovery under the direction of Magistrate Judge Tomlinson. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 10/28/2010. (Graves, Kelly)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
