Dowdell et al v. Imhof
| Margaret Dowdell and Michelle Shriki |
| John E. Imhof |
| 2:2010cv01332 |
| March 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Welfare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER denying 119 Motion to Stay. SO ORDERED that the Court has considered defts arguments and finds them unavailing. Significantly, deft has not demonstrated either likelihood of success on the merits or that it will suffer irreparable injury absent a stay. Accordingly, the motion is denied. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/12/2016. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER granting 113 Motion for Attorney Fees. SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs are awarded $470,821.23 (consisting of $470,088.70 in attorneys fees and $732.53 in costs) incurred between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 2/23/2016. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 43 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 50 Motion to Strike 49 Reply in Support. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs are awarded $261,632.44 in attorneys' fees and $4,318.47 in costs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/19/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER re 23 22 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/8/2010. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
