On Site Energy Company, Inc. v. MTU Onsite Energy Corp.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District On Site Energy Company, Inc. v. MTU Onsite Energy Corp.

On Site Energy Company, Inc. v. MTU Onsite Energy Corp.

Plaintiff:	On Site Energy Company, Inc.
Defendant:	MTU Onsite Energy Corp.
Case Number:	2:2010cv01671
Filed:	April 14, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joanna Seybert
Presiding Judge:	William D. Wall
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 2, 2013	Filing 118 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 104 Plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and/or to set aside the verdict is DENIED; re: 102 Defendant's motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART, but the Court cannot make a determin ation as to amount. If Defendant intends to proceed on this issue, it must file a motion for attorneys' fees, supported by appropriate case law and the contemporaneous time records, within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's opposition is due 14 days thereafter and Defendant's reply, if any, is due within 7 days of the opposition. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 8/2/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)
July 19, 2012	Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 44 Motion in Limine. Pending before the Court is MTU's motion to exclude two of OSE's experts: Robert Schlegel and Henry Ostberg. For the foregoing reasons, MTU's motion to exclude OSE's experts (Docket Entry 44) is DENIED in its entirety. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/19/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 2, 2013

Filing 118 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 104 Plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and/or to set aside the verdict is DENIED; re: 102 Defendant's motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART, but the Court cannot make a determin ation as to amount. If Defendant intends to proceed on this issue, it must file a motion for attorneys' fees, supported by appropriate case law and the contemporaneous time records, within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's opposition is due 14 days thereafter and Defendant's reply, if any, is due within 7 days of the opposition. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 8/2/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)

July 19, 2012

Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 44 Motion in Limine. Pending before the Court is MTU's motion to exclude two of OSE's experts: Robert Schlegel and Henry Ostberg. For the foregoing reasons, MTU's motion to exclude OSE's experts (Docket Entry 44) is DENIED in its entirety. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/19/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: On Site Energy Company, Inc. v. MTU Onsite Energy Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MTU Onsite Energy Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: On Site Energy Company, Inc.
Represented By:	Annalee Cataldo-Barile
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?