Richards v. State of New York Office of The Attorney General Andrew Cuomo et al
| James Joseph Richards |
| Clerk of Nassau County Supreme Court, Nassau County District Attorneys Office, Nassau County District Court, Nassau County Police Department First Precinct, Nassau County Police Department Headquarters, Nassau County Sheriffs Department, Nassau County Supreme Court, New York State Department of Corrections, New York State Divisin of Parole Albany Office, New York State Division of Parole Famingdale Office, New York State Division of Parole Nassau Office, State of New York Office of The Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division Second Judicial Department |
| 2:2010cv01691 |
| April 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| William D. Wall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 13 Motion to Vacate. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/23/12. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - For the reasons set forth herein, the Amended Complaint is sua sponte dismissed with prejudice as against Defendants P.O. Brown, Gouverneur Correctional Facility, P.O. Jeanasack, SPO Leone, Nassau County Correctional Center, P. O. Redd, P.O. Arguelles and Board of Parole, Division of Parole, New York State and without prejudice as against the County of Nassau and with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 by 11/30/10. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/3/10. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth above, the Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the Complaint is sua sponte dismissed without prejudice and w ith leave to file an Amended Complaint that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and in accordance with this Order by July 30, 2010. Plaintiff is warned that failure to file an Amended Complaint within this time period will result in dismi ssal of his Complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/21/10. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
