Johnson et al v. Myers et al
| Julia Johnson and Damani Jabari Myers |
| Robert Barris, John Ciapoli, Arthur A. Gianella, Donna Guarton, Benjamin Malewicz, Justice Karen Murphy, Eddie James Myers, Jr., Nassau County Baldwin, UFSD, P.O. Patterson, Dr. G. St. Victor, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Jody Weitzman-Fisher |
| 2:2010cv01964 |
| April 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 151 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 154 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the County Defendants' and Myers' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE this case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/16/2014. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 90 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the NUMC Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Dr. Robert Barris, Dr. G. St. Victor an d Arthur A. Gianella as Defendants in this action. Additionally, unless counsel makes an appearance on behalf of DJM within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, his claims will be dismissed by the Court sua sponte without prejudice. Counsel for the NUMC Defendants is ORDERED to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the pro se Plaintiffs and to file proof of service within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an y appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Party G. St. Victor, Robert Barris (MD) and Arthur A. Gianella (President/CEO Nassau University Medical Center) terminated. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/6/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 80 Motion for Reconsideration - For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and/or relief from judgment is DENIED. All claims against Defendants Donna Guarton, Nassau County Baldwin, U.S.F.D., and Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. remain dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/22/11. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Dismiss. To the extent that this motion is brought under Rule 12(b)(6), this denial is WITH PREJUDICE, because, by answering, the Nassau University Defendants forfeited their right to move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). To the extent that the Court construes the Nassau University Defendants' motion as one for summary judgment under Rule 56, this denial is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Nassau University Defendants may file a procedurally-compliant summary judgment motion at the appropriate time. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiffs. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/18/2011. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
