Litchhult v. Ustrive2, Inc.
| Mary Litchhult |
| Ustrive2, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv03311 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants defendant's motion for summary judgment in its entirety, concluding that the evidence in the record does not raise a triable issue of fact as to plaintiff's claims of retaliation or breach of contract. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/10/2013. (O'Donnell, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 : See attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 10/9/2012. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 4/17/2012. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) Modified on 4/17/2012 to indicate C/M to Pltf by Cert. Mail RR #70001670000754358029(Imrie, Robert).
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), is granted in its entirety. Plaintiff may file an Amended C omplaint within thirty days of receipt of this Memorandum and Order which, in addition to repeating her pending claims for retaliation and breach of contract, re-alleges her fraudulent inducement claim to specify why she believes the alleged statement was fraudulent. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/1/2011. (Nagiel, Svetlana)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Litchhult v. Ustrive2, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Litchhult | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ustrive2, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
