Davidson v. North Shore L.I.J.
Plaintiff: Roger Davidson
Defendant: North Shore L.I.J.
Case Number: 2:2010cv03639
Filed: August 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. COurt adopts R&R in their entirety and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint with prejudice to Rule 41(b) of FRCP for failure to prosecute. The clerk of the court is directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 5/16/2012. (Bollbach, Jean)cm to pro se by chambers by fcm on 5/16/12
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davidson v. North Shore L.I.J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Shore L.I.J.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?