Fuerst v. Fuerst

Fuerst v. Fuerst

Plaintiff:	Wolfgang Fuerst
Defendant:	Hannelore Fuerst
Case Number:	2:2010cv03941
Filed:	August 27, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Arlene R. Lindsay
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 5, 2012	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby, ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs attorney, Delice Seligman is sanctioned in the amount of $4,363.75 to be paid within 10 days of the date of this order, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/5/12. Copy of "Decision" forwarded to the Judgment Clerk. (Coleman, Laurie)
December 9, 2011	Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the Counterclaim complaint is dismissed, and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs motion to restore and amend the complaint is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendant s motion for sanctions as against the Plaintiff based on his alleged improper purpose in filing the complaint and against the Plaintiffs attorney for filing a frivolous action is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for sanct ions as against the Plaintiffs attorney based on the Plaintiffs failure to withdraw the complaint within the safe harbor provision provided by Rule 11(c)(2) is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Court imposes sanctions on the Plaintiffs att orney, Delice Seligman, Esq., in an amount to be determined following the Defendants submission of her costs and attorneys fees incurred in filing and litigating the motion for sanctions, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendant is directed to s ubmit within 10 days of the date of this order, records reflecting the hours expended by her attorney and the costs incurred in filing and defending the motion for sanctions. The attorney for the Plaintiff is afforded an opportunity to respond to the amount of sanctions within five days of the receipt of the Defendants application. No reply will be accepted. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 12/9/2011. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 5, 2012

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby, ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs attorney, Delice Seligman is sanctioned in the amount of $4,363.75 to be paid within 10 days of the date of this order, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/5/12. Copy of "Decision" forwarded to the Judgment Clerk. (Coleman, Laurie)

December 9, 2011

Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the Counterclaim complaint is dismissed, and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs motion to restore and amend the complaint is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendant s motion for sanctions as against the Plaintiff based on his alleged improper purpose in filing the complaint and against the Plaintiffs attorney for filing a frivolous action is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for sanct ions as against the Plaintiffs attorney based on the Plaintiffs failure to withdraw the complaint within the safe harbor provision provided by Rule 11(c)(2) is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Court imposes sanctions on the Plaintiffs att orney, Delice Seligman, Esq., in an amount to be determined following the Defendants submission of her costs and attorneys fees incurred in filing and litigating the motion for sanctions, and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendant is directed to s ubmit within 10 days of the date of this order, records reflecting the hours expended by her attorney and the costs incurred in filing and defending the motion for sanctions. The attorney for the Plaintiff is afforded an opportunity to respond to the amount of sanctions within five days of the receipt of the Defendants application. No reply will be accepted. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 12/9/2011. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuerst v. Fuerst
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hannelore Fuerst
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wolfgang Fuerst
Represented By:	Delice Seligman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?