Scharff et al v. Shah-Gavnoudias et al
| Michael Godino, Long Island Council of the Blind, Edward Molloy and Lori Scharff |
| County of Nassau and Shila Shah-Gavnoudias |
| 2:2010cv04208 |
| September 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Denis R. Hurley |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : This Court adopts the May 20, 2016 Report and Recommendation of Judge Brown as if set forth herein. Also before the Court is the parties joint request for a judgment as to all the monies to be paid by the C ounty pursuant to the Consent Decree. That joint application is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees be granted and that plaintiffs be awarded attorneys fees in the total amount of $217,110.80 and the joint application for a judgment as to all monies to be paid by the County pursuant to the Consent Decree is hereby granted. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 6/6/2016. (Gapinski, Michele)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the parties' motions for summary judgment are denied. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 6/2/2014. (O'Connor, Madeline)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
