Ferrari v. County of Suffolk et al
Plaintiff: James B. Ferrari
Defendant: County of Suffolk, John Does 1-10 and Christine Malafi
Case Number: 2:2010cv04218
Filed: September 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Presiding Judge: William D. Wall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of liability is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and re: 54 County's Motion for Summary Judgment is also GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgme nt is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff on the issue of liability on the procedural due process claim arising out of the County's failure to meet its burden at retention hearings and is otherwise DENIED. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of the C ounty on the substantive due process claim as well as Plaintiff's other procedural due process claims, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The County's motion is otherwise DENIED. The action is hereby REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown to resolve any remaining pretrial issues and to determine whether this action is ready for trial on the issue of damages on the procedural due process claim for which summary judgment has been granted in favor of Plaintiff i.e., the claim regarding the County's failure to meet its burden at retention hearings. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 8/6/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth herein, this motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The claims against Suffolk County remain, but the claims against Christine Malafi and John Does #1-10 ("Individual Defendants") are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/7/2011. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferrari v. County of Suffolk et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Suffolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Malafi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James B. Ferrari
Represented By: Andrew J. Campanelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?