Vallen v. Miraglia et al
| Barry Vallen |
| Current Govenor of New York State and Richard Miraglia |
| 2:2010cv04225 |
| September 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER AND CIVIL JUDGMENT - ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as set forth herein and in the Court's December 30, 2010 Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/12/11. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file the Complaint without prepayment of the $350.00 filing fees or security. ORDERED the Cler k of the Court mail a copy of this Order, to the Plaintiff. ORDERED that the Complaint in its entirety is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/30/10. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
