Williams v. County of Nassau et al
Rashard Williams |
Sgt. Arnold, Police Officer Barne, Police Officer Bened, Police Officer Michael Carey, County of Nassau, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and Police Officer Monel |
2:2010cv04815 |
October 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Joanna Seybert |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 DECISION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART. By stipulation, Defendants Barnes and Benedetto, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution, and Plaintiff's clai m for punitive damages against Defendant Nassau County are DISMISSED. Further, Plaintiff's Monell claim and false arrest claim as to Plaintiff's formal arrest are DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff may proceed on his false arrest claim as to th e events preceding the formal arrest, and on his excessive force claim. Finally, Defendants will not be granted qualified immunity at this time, and Plaintiff may continue to pursue punitive damages against individual Defendants Carey, Monell, and A rnold. The parties are directed to proceed with any remaining discovery in accordance with this Order. The five-day jury trial in this action will begin at 9:30 am on June 8, 2015. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 8/18/2014. (Brucella, Michelle) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.