Smith v. County of Nassau et al
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Defendant: County of Nassau, Police Officers John and Jane Does 1 - 10, Anna Gaetano, Police Officer James Healy, Police Officer Martin Helmke, Police Officer Nicole Loduca, Police Officer Timothy Slevin, Harry G. Terezakis and Zurich Associates, Ltd.
Case Number: 2:2010cv04874
Filed: October 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 161 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 158 and 159 , the parties' pre-trial motions. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order, the Court grants in part and denies in part the parties' motions. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 11/18/2023. (JYJ)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts in part, and declines to adopt in part, Judge Locke's Report and Recommendations. The Court grants the County Defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff's due process and malicious prosecution claims, and denies the motion with respect to Plaintiff's false arrest and abuse of process claims. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/31/2015. (Bewaji, Omolara)
July 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, the County Defendants' motion for reconsideration and for vacatur of the $500.00 per diem sanctions award issued as part of the Court's March 26, 2013 Order is granted. In all other respects, the motion is denied. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 7/24/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: Pursuant to a follow-up conference held on July 10, 2013 - addressing issues unresolved at the telephone conference held on July 8, 2013 - the attached additional rulings apply. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 7/10/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER re 56 Notice(Other) filed by Nicole Loduca, James Healy, Martin Helmke, County of Nassau, Timothy Slevin: The attached rulings were made at the telephone conference conducted on July 8, 2013. Another conference will be held on the u nresolved portions of this Order on July 10, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 830, Alfonse M. D'Amato U.S. Courthouse, Central Islip, New York. All counsel shall be present. SEE Order for further details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 7/8/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)
March 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Sanctions: Discovery is certified as complete with respect to the County Defendants. In addition, the individual County Defendants are precluded from offering any evidence in support of or opposition to any dispositive motion and from testifying at trial unless he or she submits to a deposition on a mutually agreed date and time before May 15, 2013 - at the place noticed by plaintiff's counsel. Monetary sanctions are awarded in favor of plaintiff and against Assistant County Attorney Scott in the sum of $500.00 per day, as and for a sanction based on the failure to comply with the Order of the Court dated October 18, 2012. These sanctions shall apply in the event that the County Defendants continue to fail to fully comply with the October 18, 2012 Order of the Court. Lastly, the Court grants the plaintiffs request for costs relating to the instant motion. Such costs are assessed against Assistant County Attorney Scott. Any such application by plaintiff to assess relevant costs shall be filed on notice to all parties within ten (10) business days. Opposition shall be filed within ten (10) business days thereafter and any reply within five (5) days thereaft er. The County Defendants are on notice that the continued stonewalling of discovery in this action in the future will be addressed by the sanctions outlined in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(i)-(vii) and 16(f), including contempt of court. In all other respects, plaintiff's motion is denied. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/26/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. County of Nassau et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Nassau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officers John and Jane Does 1 - 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anna Gaetano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer James Healy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer Martin Helmke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer Nicole Loduca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer Timothy Slevin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harry G. Terezakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zurich Associates, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Represented By: Gregory Calliste, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?