Manello v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Manello v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Manello v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Mark Manello
Defendant:	Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number:	2:2011cv00243
Filed:	January 14, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge:	William D. Wall
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2012	Filing 12 OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that deft's 10 motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted to the extent that plaintiff's (a) second, fourth, sixth, ninth , eleventh and thirteenth claims for relief are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, (b) fifth and twelfth claims for relief are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, except insofar as those claims allege that plaintiffs termination was retaliatory, and (c) first claim for relief is dismissed to the extent it is based upon acts occurring prior to January 7, 2008, as time-barred, and deft's motion is otherwise denied. The parties are directed to appear, with authority or with in dividuals with authority to settle this matter, in my courtroom located at 1010 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York, on September 27,2012 at 11:15 a.m. for an initial conference before me. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/4/2012. (Florio, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2012

Filing 12 OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that deft's 10 motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted to the extent that plaintiff's (a) second, fourth, sixth, ninth , eleventh and thirteenth claims for relief are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, (b) fifth and twelfth claims for relief are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, except insofar as those claims allege that plaintiffs termination was retaliatory, and (c) first claim for relief is dismissed to the extent it is based upon acts occurring prior to January 7, 2008, as time-barred, and deft's motion is otherwise denied. The parties are directed to appear, with authority or with in dividuals with authority to settle this matter, in my courtroom located at 1010 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York, on September 27,2012 at 11:15 a.m. for an initial conference before me. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/4/2012. (Florio, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manello v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Manello
Represented By:	Wayne J. Schaefer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?