Bryson et al

Bryson et al

Petitioner:	Ronald Bryson
Respondent:	John B. Lemke
Case Number:	2:2011cv00749
Filed:	February 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2013	Filing 26 OPINION and ORDER: SO ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the proceeding is dismissed in its entirety. As petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a violation of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(l); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003); Contino v. United States, 535 F.3d 124, 127 (2d Cir. 2008). Petitioner has a right to seek a certif icate of appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, close this case, and serve notice of entry of this Order on ail parties in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Ru1es of Civil Procedure. CM to pro se petitioner. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/1/2013. (Florio, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2013

Filing 26 OPINION and ORDER: SO ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the proceeding is dismissed in its entirety. As petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a violation of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(l); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003); Contino v. United States, 535 F.3d 124, 127 (2d Cir. 2008). Petitioner has a right to seek a certif icate of appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, close this case, and serve notice of entry of this Order on ail parties in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Ru1es of Civil Procedure. CM to pro se petitioner. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/1/2013. (Florio, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryson et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronald Bryson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: John B. Lemke
Represented By:	Grazia R. DiVincenzo
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE SUFFOLK CO
Represented By:	SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?