Seaborn Marina, Inc. v. M/V Priorities et al
Seaborn Marina, Inc. |
Charter One Bank N.A., M/V Priorities and Annette McAvoy |
2:2011cv01591 |
April 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Denis R. Hurley |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Having reviewed the R&R de novo, the Court adopts it in its entirety. As to whether the additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages and costs, that matter is referred to Magistra te Judge Lindsay for Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a default judgment is granted to the extent that plaintiff is entitled to enforce the maritime lien in rem over the vessel and extinguishment of any and all rights or claims that Charter Bank may still possess with regard to the vessel, but denied without prejudice to the extent plaintiff seeks an award of damages and costs; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lindsay for a Report and Recommendation as to whether the additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages and costs. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/24/2017. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.