Qureshi v. Nassau BOCES et al
Plaintiff: Naila M. Qureshi
Defendant: Nassau BOCES and Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services
Case Number: 2:2011cv02444
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge: William D. Wall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS For the foregoing reasons, Magistrate Judge Wall's Report is adopted as an Order of the Court. Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings 47 is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is di smissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U S 438, 444-45(1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case and, pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the FRCP, serve notice of entry of this Order upon all parties including by mailing a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff at her last known address, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b)(2)(C). So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/1/2013. (a copy of this Order has been sent to pro se plaintiff on 5/2/2013) (Padilla, Kristin)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs failure to hire and unequal terms and conditions claims are dismissed without prejudice because she has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. Plaintiffs unlawful termination claim is also dismissed without prejudice. However, plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint with respect to this claim within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order. If plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, it s hall be labeled "amended complaint" and shall contain sufficient allegations to state her claim that her termination violated Title VII and/or the AD EA. If plaintiff fails to timely file an s/ Sandra J. Feuerstein amended complaint, this claim will be dismissed with prejudice and the case will be closed. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/23/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qureshi v. Nassau BOCES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nassau BOCES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naila M. Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?