Carson Optical, Inc. et al v. Prym Consumer USA, Inc.
Leading Extreme Optimist Industries, LTD. and Carson Optical, Inc. |
Prym Consumer USA, Inc. |
2:2011cv03677 |
July 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Sandra J. Feuerstein |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER re 80 82 : see attached Memorandum and Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 3/28/2014. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 88 ORDER re 86 87 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/14/2013. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 78 ORDER re 76 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 5/14/2013. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 73 ORDER re 56 : see attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 5/2/2013. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 63 ORDER re 26 27 : See attached Memorandum and Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 3/25/2013. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting 35 : See attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 10/22/2012. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 32 ORDER re 30 31 : see attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 9/7/2012. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.