Brown v. Mall at Smith Haven, LLC et al
| Christopher E. Brown |
| MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc., Sears, Roebuck and Co and Mall at Smith Haven, LLC |
| 2:2011cv05398 |
| November 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER re: #29 Stipulation of Dismissal. The claims against the Mall at Smith Haven, LLC are now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/26/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)
|
| Filing 29 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Mall at Smith Haven, LLC by Christopher E. Brown (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Re: #27 Stipulation & Order of Dismissal without Prejudice as to Defendant Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 5/31/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
| Filing 27 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice by Christopher E. Brown (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Since the parties have executed a Stipulation of Dismissal, the May 31, 2012 Conference is hereby cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/30/2012. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 26 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #25 Telephone Conference,, Affirmation of Service by Christopher E. Brown (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
Filing 25
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson: Telephone Conference held on 4/25/2012. I am giving the parties until May 31, 2012 to obtain the expert report and conduct their discussions regarding whether this case is amenable to resolution without further litigation. The next conference will be held in Courtroom 910 on May 31, 2012 at 3 p.m. The Court hereby directs Attorney Ku to serve a copy of this Order upon the expert, Soy Williams, forthwith and to file proof of service on ECF. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for additional information. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 4/25/2012. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 24 Letter by Christopher E. Brown (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
ORDER granting #23 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The April 4, 2012 Telephone Conference is hereby ADJOURNED to April 25, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. In the meantime, counsel are to provide the Court with an indication as to when the inspection report will be completed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 3/29/2012. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 23 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference by MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc.. (Krebs, Diane) |
|
Filing 22
Order Dismissing Parties Re: #20 Stipulation & Order of Dismissal without Prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Sears, Roebuck and Co. as a Defendant. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/29/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing 21
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson: Initial Conference Hearing held on 2/27/2012. The next conference will be held by telephone on April 4, 2012 at 11:30 a.m. I am giving counsel 30 days to try to effect a final resolution of this action. If the matter is not resolved by our next conference on April 4, 2012, then I will implement the Case Management and Scheduling Order and discovery will proceed immediately. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 2/27/2012. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant Sears, Roebuck And Co. by Christopher E. Brown (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 19 Proposed Scheduling Order Case Management and Scheduling Order by Christopher E. Brown (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E. Brown. Mall at Smith Haven, LLC served on 11/18/2011, answer due 1/9/2012. (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E. Brown. Sears, Roebuck and Co. served on 11/18/2011, answer due 12/9/2011. (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E. Brown. (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The January 18, 2012 Initial Conference is hereby ADJOURNED to February 27, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 1/17/2012. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference Scheduled for January 18, 2012 by Christopher E. Brown. (Rosario, Olivia) |
|
Filing 14
Order Dismissing Parties Re: #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Mall at Smith Haven, LLC. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Mall at Smith Haven, LLC as a Defendant in this action. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/10/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Egler, Theresa) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christopher E. Brown As to Defendant Mall at Smith Haven, LLC (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Theresa Donahue Egler on behalf of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (aty to be noticed) (Egler, Theresa) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 1/18/2012 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. No later than two business days before the discovery planning conference, the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF (Electronic Case Filing) system, a joint proposed discovery plan. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/8/2011. (Spatola, Richard)
|
|
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #3 . The submitted Stipulation extending the time for Defendant Sears Roebuck & Co. to answer, move, or otherwise reply to the complaint to January 9, 2012 is hereby "So Ordered." Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/8/2011. (Spatola, Richard)
|
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The submitted stipulation extending the time for Defendant Mall at Smith Haven, LLC to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint to January 9, 2012 is hereby "So Ordered." Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/8/2011. (Spatola, Richard)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc.. (Krebs, Diane) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc. (Krebs, Diane) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Diane Krebs on behalf of MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Krebs, Diane) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Mall at Smith Haven, LLC. (Fish, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Robert Fish on behalf of Mall at Smith Haven, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Fish, Eric) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Allyson Marie Smith on behalf of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (aty to be noticed) (Smith, Allyson) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Reply to Complaint by Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Egler, Theresa) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E. Brown. MACY'S Retail Holdings, Inc. served on 11/16/2011, answer due 12/7/2011. (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Case Ineligible for Arbitration (Bollbach, Jean) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Christopher E. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rios, Laura) |
| FILING FEE: $ 350, receipt number 4653035965 (Rios, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
