Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Reeve et al
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
Charlotte H. Reeve, George J. Reeve, Jr., The Law Firm of Arthur M. Garel and Arthur M. Garel |
2:2011cv06238 |
December 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Arthur D. Spatt |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the Order dated February 7, 2013, is hereby amended to state that the claims against the Attorney Defendants are dismissed without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs request for a Clerks Certificate of Default is denied; and it is further ORDERED, that the Reeve Defendants requests for extensions of time to file their answers are granted. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/23/13. (Coleman, Laurie) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the Attorney Defendants motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 18) is granted and the claims against them are dismissed with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that the Reeve Defendants m otion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim is denied; and it is further ORDERED, that the Reeve Defendants motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages is granted. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/7/2013. (Coleman, Laurie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.