Sethi v. Nassau County et al
| Harsharan Sethi |
| Nassau County, Nassau County Police Department, RXR Management Company, Nassau County P.O. Jeff Bigger and P.O. Eviscerate |
| RXR Security Guard Randy LNU |
| 2:2011cv06380 |
| December 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff take nothing of defts; that defts motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of civil Procedure 56 is granted; and that this case is hereby closed. CM with appeal packet to pro se plaintiff. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED that the County Defts' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 6/3/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. So Ordered.. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/13/2013. (Padilla, Kristin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
