Kemper v. Westbury Operating Corp. et al
| Mavis Kemper |
| Norman Shapiro and Westbury Operating Corp. |
| 2:2012cv00895 |
| February 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Certify Class: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, plaintiffs' motion for conditional authorization to proceed as a collective action is granted. Plaintiffs' proposed Notice of Lawsuit and Conse nt to Join Lawsuit form is hereby approved, subject to the modifications discussed within the Order. The parties are ordered to submit a revised proposed Notice within ten days of the date of this Order. Subject to the Court's approval of the revised Notice, plaintiffs are authorized to circulate the Notice of Lawsuit and Consent to Join Lawsuit form to all housemen, housekeepers, and others in similar cleaning jobs, who have been employed by defendants within three years prior to the filing of the motion for certification, and to post the Notice at defendants' business locations. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 10/17/2012. (Suarez, Stephanie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
