Chabra et al v. Maplewood Partners, L.P. et al
| Narinder Chabra, Parvinder Chabra and Surinder Chabra |
| Ron Augustin, Glen Dell, Robert V. Glaser and Maplewood Partners, L.P. |
| Lt. General Buster C. Glosson |
| 2:2012cv01113 |
| March 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, Judge Lindsay's R&R (Docket Entry 92) is ADOPTED in its entirety; Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proc edure 41(a)(2) (Docket Entry 80) is GRANTED; and Defendant's cross-motion for sanctions (Docket Entry 81) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/7/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 39 Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is DENIED and Plaintiffs' 45 Cross-Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT. Parties Buster C. Glosson, Ron Augustin, and Glen Dell are TERMINATED from this action as the claims in the First Amended Complaint pertain only to Maplewood. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/19/2014. (Nohs, Bonnie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
