Dekom et al v. New York et al
| Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton |
| Evelyn Aquila, William Biamonte, Andrew Cuomo, James Walsh, Louis Savinetti, Eric Schneiderman, Douglas Kellner, Nassau County Board of Elections, New York, New York State Board of Elections and Gregory P. Peterson |
| 2:2012cv01318 |
| March 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 34 Motion for Recusal & Three Judge Panel; denying 54 Motion to Strike; denying 59 Motion to Strike. For the reasons set forth herein, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and all of Plaintiffs' motions are DENIED. This Memorandum and Order will also address Plaintiffs' ; request for default (Docket Entry 40), which, although already properly denied by the Clerk of the Court, Plaintiffs still believe is pending (Docket Entry 48). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to each of the pro se Plaintiffs and to mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/18/2013. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
