Willaims v. Suffolk County Corrections

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Willaims v. Suffolk County Corrections

Willaims v. Suffolk County Corrections

Plaintiff:	Chris I. Willaims
Defendant:	Suffolk County Corrections
Case Number:	2:2012cv01761
Filed:	April 9, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge:	Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 23, 2012	Filing 4 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION - The Court hereby ORDERS that the fifty-nine (59) above-captioned actions be consolidated for all purposes, to proceed under the lead case 11cv2602. The Clerk of the Court is directed to (i) consolidate these actions, and (ii ) mark all of the member cases closed. All future filings are to be docketed in the lead case, 11cv2602. Shearman & Sterling LLPs appointment as pro bono counsel to the Plaintiffs in 11cv2602 is extended to all Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action. Shearman & Sterling LLP is directed to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint on behalf of the Consolidated Plaintiffs by March 5, 2012. Once filed, the Consolidated Amended Complaint will supercede each of the individual complaints, rendering them of no legal effect, and will be the operative complaint upon which the Consolidated Action will proceed. Upon receipt of the Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending in forma pauperis motions filed on the above cases. Any future actions commenced pro se by any of the Consolidated Plaintiffs shall be randomly assigned or, if one of the Consolidated Plaintiffs has previously filed a pro se complaint unrelated to the Consolidated Action, his action s hall be automatically assigned to the district judge who presided over the earlier-filed action. When a pro se action which relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action is hereafter filed in the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall: (1) As sign each subsequently filed action a new case number to proceed before the undersigned and Mag. Judge Gary R. Brown; (2) Docket this Order in each Newly-Filed Action; (3) Consolidate each Newly-Filed Action with 11cv2602 and make an appropriate entr y on the Consolidated Actions docket so indicating; (4) Mail a copy of the Complaint in each Newly-Filed Action to counsel for the Consolidated Plaintiffs at Lynch v. DeMarco Case Team; (5) Mail a copy of this Order and a copy of the Consolidated Ame nded Complaint to the Plaintiff in the Newly-Filed Action; and (6) Administratively close each Newly-Filed Action. Any claims raised in a Newly-Filed Action that are not raised in the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be severed. Any Plaintiff wit h severed claims may proceed with those severed claims after the resolution of the Consolidated Action by moving to have their Newly-Filed Actions reopened within 30 days of the entry of judgment in the Consolidated Action. Any pending application fo r in forma pauperis status and for the appointment of counsel filed in Newly-Filed Actions commenced after the filing of the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be denied without prejudice as moot with leave to renew if and when the cases are reopen ed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate such motions as moot when the Newly-Filed cases are administratively closed. Any Plaintiff who does not wish to proceed as part of the Consolidated Action must so indicate in a letter to the Court w ithin 30 days of receiving a copy of this Order. Upon receipt of such a letter, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to sever that Plaintiffs Complaint from the Consolidated Amended Complaint and reopen and reinstate his individual action. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/23/12. C/M (Valle, Christine)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 23, 2012

Filing 4 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION - The Court hereby ORDERS that the fifty-nine (59) above-captioned actions be consolidated for all purposes, to proceed under the lead case 11cv2602. The Clerk of the Court is directed to (i) consolidate these actions, and (ii ) mark all of the member cases closed. All future filings are to be docketed in the lead case, 11cv2602. Shearman & Sterling LLPs appointment as pro bono counsel to the Plaintiffs in 11cv2602 is extended to all Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action. Shearman & Sterling LLP is directed to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint on behalf of the Consolidated Plaintiffs by March 5, 2012. Once filed, the Consolidated Amended Complaint will supercede each of the individual complaints, rendering them of no legal effect, and will be the operative complaint upon which the Consolidated Action will proceed. Upon receipt of the Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending in forma pauperis motions filed on the above cases. Any future actions commenced pro se by any of the Consolidated Plaintiffs shall be randomly assigned or, if one of the Consolidated Plaintiffs has previously filed a pro se complaint unrelated to the Consolidated Action, his action s hall be automatically assigned to the district judge who presided over the earlier-filed action. When a pro se action which relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action is hereafter filed in the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall: (1) As sign each subsequently filed action a new case number to proceed before the undersigned and Mag. Judge Gary R. Brown; (2) Docket this Order in each Newly-Filed Action; (3) Consolidate each Newly-Filed Action with 11cv2602 and make an appropriate entr y on the Consolidated Actions docket so indicating; (4) Mail a copy of the Complaint in each Newly-Filed Action to counsel for the Consolidated Plaintiffs at Lynch v. DeMarco Case Team; (5) Mail a copy of this Order and a copy of the Consolidated Ame nded Complaint to the Plaintiff in the Newly-Filed Action; and (6) Administratively close each Newly-Filed Action. Any claims raised in a Newly-Filed Action that are not raised in the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be severed. Any Plaintiff wit h severed claims may proceed with those severed claims after the resolution of the Consolidated Action by moving to have their Newly-Filed Actions reopened within 30 days of the entry of judgment in the Consolidated Action. Any pending application fo r in forma pauperis status and for the appointment of counsel filed in Newly-Filed Actions commenced after the filing of the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be denied without prejudice as moot with leave to renew if and when the cases are reopen ed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate such motions as moot when the Newly-Filed cases are administratively closed. Any Plaintiff who does not wish to proceed as part of the Consolidated Action must so indicate in a letter to the Court w ithin 30 days of receiving a copy of this Order. Upon receipt of such a letter, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to sever that Plaintiffs Complaint from the Consolidated Amended Complaint and reopen and reinstate his individual action. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/23/12. C/M (Valle, Christine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willaims v. Suffolk County Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Suffolk County Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris I. Willaims
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?