Chillemi v. The Town of Southampton et al
| Craig J. Chillemi |
| James Kiernan, Eric Sickles, The Town of Southampton and Thomas Tully |
| 2:2012cv03370 |
| July 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment on the compelled self-incrimination claim and on all claims as to defendant Thomas Tully, and denies the motion in all other respects. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 12/20/2017. (Baum, Sabrina) (Main Document 94 replaced on 12/20/2017) (Bollbach, Jean).
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - For the reasons contained in this opinion, the Plaintiffs 60 motion to set aside the Underlying Order is denied. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/7/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
59
The Court hereby issues this Memorandum and Order embodying the decisions rendered on March 31, 2015. [DE 58]. SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM & ORDER for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 4/20/2015. (Kandel, Erin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
