The Wingates, LLC et al v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of America
| Matrix Realty Group, Inc. and The Wingates, LLC |
| Commonwealth Insurance Company of America |
| 2:2012cv03880 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs letter motion dated April 29, 2014 seeking to re-open discovery and make expert disclosures is denied; and it is further ORDERED, that Commonwealths motion to strike the aff idavit of Steven G. Hess is granted in part and denied in part. In particular, the motion to strike is granted to the extent Hess purports to render expert opinions, and is otherwise denied; and it is further ORDERED, that Commonwealths motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted in its entirety, the complaint is dismissed, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/19/14. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs 9 motion to remand this action to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is denied. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/4/13. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
