Konrad v. Epley et al
| Evelyn Konrad |
| William Brown, Mark Epley, Denis Guerin, Donald Quintin, Melinda Quintin, Elbert W. Robinson, Jr. and Paul Robinson |
| 2:2012cv04021 |
| August 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having conducted a de novo review of the R&R in its entirety, the Court adopts the R&R in all respects. Thus, the Court grants defendants' motions to dismiss the federal claims, and declinesto exercise s upplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims. The Court also denies plaintiff's motion to amend, as well as the various motions for sanctions. In addition, for the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's other requests for relief from t his Court (including, inter alia, for protective orders and for allegedly missing documents) are denied. Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The Court warns plaintiff against filing any future actions against defendants that are of the same substantive nature as those at issue here, at the risk of being permanently enjoined from such filings and being sanctioned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. The Co urt certifies, pursuant to 78 U.S.C. § 19l5(a)(3), that any appeal from this Orderwould not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal.. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 11/25/2013. (Bollbach, Jean) cm by chambers to pro se deft William Brown by fcm on 11/25/13
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER denying 80 Motion to Compel: Plaintiff's application with respect to service of process on defendant, William Brown, is denied as moot, since he has been served at his address in New Canaan, Connecticut. The Court will treat the remai ning aspect of plaintiff's April 14, 2013 submission as a request for reconsideration of the sua sponte stay of discovery imposed pending the outcome of defendants' motions to dismiss. Reconsideration is granted, and on such reconsideratio n the original determination to stay all discovery on December 7, 2012 is re-affirmed. SEE Order for further details. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this Order on pro se defendant William Brown upon receipt. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 4/23/2013. (c/m) (Minerva, Deanna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
