Guobadia v. Irowa et al
| Destiny Joy Guobadia |
| Isoken Irowa and Uhumwnamure Lucky Irowa |
| 2:2012cv04042 |
| August 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER - Accordingly, the Court finds no basis for sealing the entire case record in this matter, and denies the Defendants 98 application. To the extent the Plaintiffs letter to the Court expressly requests that the Court enforce the terms of the s ettlement agreement, its application is denied without prejudice and with leave to file a formal motion for relief arising from the alleged contract dispute. However, the Court notes that, in open court on October 5, 2015, the Defendants were sworn and consented to the material terms of the settlement under oath. They specifically represented to this Court that they understood the import of the eventual confidentiality provision, and, as noted above, successfully requested that the transcribed record of those proceedings - the only public document evidencing the terms of the agreement - be sealed. In light of these facts, the Court administratively closed the case. At that time, the Court did not grant an application to seal the entire rec ord. Rather, the following exchange took place: (see Order). Nevertheless, to the extent the scope of the Courts ruling was unclear to the Defendants, any remaining confusion should now be alleviated for the reasons stated in this opinion. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/3/2015.c/m to defts. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER denying 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; Based on the foregoing reasons, the Defendants motion for summary judgment is denied. However, with regard to the Plaintiffs TVPRA claim, the Court finds that she cannot recover based on any of the alleged conduct of the Defendants that occurred prior to December 19, 2003. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/7/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re 64 68 : see attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/25/2014. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER re 33 and 34 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 1/14/2014. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re 19 and 26 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 10/2/2013. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
