Sturgis v. Suffolk County Jail et al
| Jemmy Lee Sturgis |
| Suffolk County Jail, Suffolk County Police, Suffolk County D.A., P.O. John Doe, ny unknown, Jane Doe, Tommy Toe and Willie Woe |
| 2:2012cv05263 |
| October 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff take nothing of defts; that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and to comply with orders of the court; that this case is hereby closed; and that in forma pauperis status for the purpose of any appeal is denied. CM with appeal packet to pro se plaintiff. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: SO ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Brown's Report is accepted in its entirety and this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure fo r failure to prosecute and to comply with orders of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment against plaintiff in this action, close this case and, pursuant to Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, serve notice of entry of this Order upon all parties as provided in Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and record such service on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/5/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the complaint is sua sponte dismissed with prejudice as against the Jail, the SCPD and the Distri ct Attorney pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(l) and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice as against the County, unless plaintiff files an amended complaint in accordance with this Order on or before February 25, 2013. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of the Complaint and this Order to the Suffolk County Attorney and the Suffolk County Attorney shall attempt to ascertain the full names and service address(es) of the "John Doe" officers invol ved in the incident described in the Complaint and to produce such information to the Court within two (2) weeks from the date that this Order is served upon him. Once the information is provided by the Suffolk County Attorney, plaintiff's compl aint shall be deemed amended to reflect the full names of the "John Doe" officers, summonses shall be issued and the United States Marshal Service shall serve those defts. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Suffolk County Police, Suffolk County D.A. and Suffolk County Jail terminated. CM to pro se plaintiff and cm with a copy of the complaint mailed via certified mail with rrr (70069 2150 0001 2097 5210) to the Suffolk County Attorney. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 1/22/2013. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
