Bendo et al v. Bautista et al
Randolph D. Bendo, Christian M. Garcia, Winnie Q. Go and Jennilyn L. Munda |
Christopher Bautista, Melody T. Bautista and Mamaroneck Physical Therapy, P.C. |
2:2012cv05367 |
October 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
E. Thomas Boyle |
Denis R. Hurley |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The Court adopts the August 30, 2017 R&R of Judge Shields. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendants Melody T. Bautista, Christopher Bautista a nd Mamaroneck Physical Therapy, P.C. be granted and that plaintiff be awarded of damages in the total amount of $183,957.50 as against said defendants, jointly and severally, consisting of (1) $63,040.24 in damages to plaintiff Randolph D. Bendo, (2) $58,707.02 in damages to plaintiff Jennilyn L. Munda, (3) $46,480.30 in damages to plaintiff Winnie Q. Go, (4) $15,379.94 damages to plaintiff Christian M. Garcia, and (5) $350 in costs, plus post-judgment interest ther eon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees be denied without prejudice to renewal. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/20/2017. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.