United States of America v. Hamill et al
| United States of America |
| XYZ Corporation, Bessie Merritt, John Doe #1-10 and Ann Hamill |
| 2:2013cv00169 |
| January 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 USA Plaintiff |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation - Thus, having reviewed Judge Walls Report and finds it to be persuasive and without any legal or factual errors, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment of fo reclosure is denied without prejudice. The Plaintiff should direct its requests concerning both its motion to amend the caption and its renewed motion for a default judgment to Judge Wall, as the Court hereby respectfully refers these matters to him for a recommendation as to (1) whether the motion to amend the caption should be granted; (2) whether, upon the Plaintiffs renewed motion, a judgment of foreclosure and sale should be awarded, and (3) whether any other relief should be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 14 and 20 and to note the referral. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/10/14. (Coleman, Laurie) (Main Document 22 replaced on 7/11/2014) (Coleman, Laurie).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
