Reid v. Nassau County Sheriff Dept. et al
Plaintiff: Dwayne M. Reid
Defendant: John Doe, Nassau County Sheriff Dept. and Sheriff Sposato
Case Number: 2:2013cv01192
Filed: February 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge: William D. Wall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 514 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - For the reasons set forth herein, so much of Magistrate Judge Locke's Report as recommends that defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Williams, and the County's and Sposato&# 039;s motion to dismiss the claims of McClendon, be granted without prejudice and with leave to re-plead to the extent set forth therein is accepted in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, defendants' motion for judgment on the p leadings as to Williams, and the County's ans Sposato's motion to dismiss the claims of McClen, are granted and Williams's and McClendon's claims in their original complaints are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice and w ith leave to re-plead in accordance with the Report. McClendon must file an amended complaint in accordance with the Report by no later than 6/11/2018, or he will be deemed to have waived his right to file an amended complaint and his claims in this consolidated action will be dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. Accordingly, the pretrial conference scheduled to be held before the undersigned on 5/14/2018 is adjourned to 7/19/2018 at 11:15AM in Courtroom 1010 at the Central Islip Courthou se, located at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all remaining parties to the consolidat ed action, including Williams and McClendon, in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/10/2018. (Tirado, Chelsea)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 326 OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that the County defts motion seeking dismissal of Tedescos, Youngs, Fenelons, Marones and Mayos claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the PLRA is granted to the extent th at, (1) with the exception of Tedescos claims against C.O. Hayman, Tedescos claims against the County defts are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) Tedescos Section 1983 claims against C.O. H ayman are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief; (3) Youngs and Mayos claims against the County defts are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (4) Fene lons claims against the County defts are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief; and (5) Marones claims against the County defts are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to exhaust adminis trative remedies and failure to state a claim for relief, and the motion is otherwise denied. There being no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of the County defts on Tedescos claims against them pursuant to R ule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of the Court shall: (1) sever Tedescos remaining claims against the NUMC defendants from this consolidated action and re-open the case under docket number 14-cv-1054 for the purpose of proc eeding with Tedescos claims against the NUMC defts; and (2) sever Youngs, Fenelons, Marones and Mayos claims from this consolidated action and re-open those cases under docket numbers 14-cv-1675, 14-cv-1143, 14-cv-3786 and 14-cv-3861, respectively, f or the purpose of entering judgment in favor of the County defts. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all current parties to the consolidate d action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to all current pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/31/2016. (Florio, Lisa)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 321 OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that the branch of the County defts motion seeking dismissal of Espinals claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the PLRA for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is granted and Espinals claims against the County defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Clerk of the Court shall sever Espinals claims from this consolidated action and re-open the case under docket number 13-cv-5653 for the purpose of entering judgment in favor of the County defts. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to all current pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/24/2016. (Florio, Lisa)
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 306 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 183 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 187 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; For the reasons set forth above, (1) the Armor/Miller defendants motion seeking dismissal of Tedescos Section 1983 claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the PLRA is granted to the extent that (a) with the exception of Tedescos claim that Dr. Kay-Njemanzi deprived him of a bland diet food tray, his Section 1983 claims against the Armor/Miller defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to state a clai m for relief, and (b) with the exception of Tedescos claim regarding Dr. Kay-Njemanzis treatment of him on or about July 26, 2011, his Section 1983 claims against the Armor/Miller defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for his fa ilure to exhaust administrative remedies, and the Armor/Miller defendants motion is otherwise denied; (2) the Medical/Dental defendants motion seeking dismissal of Young Section 1983 claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and the PLRA is grant ed and Youngs Section 1983 claims against the Medical/Dental defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and to state a claim for relief; and (3) the branch of the Armor/Sanchez defendants motion seeking dismissal of Marones Section 1983 claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is granted and Marones Section 1983 claims against the Armor/Sanchez defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief, and the motion is otherwise denied. There being no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment (1) in favor of the Armor/Miller defendants on Tedescos claims against them; (2) in favor of the Medical/Dental defenda nts on Youngs claims against them; and (3) in favor of the Armor/Sanchez defendants on Marones claims against them, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, th e Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all current parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed.2d 21 (1962). SO ORDERED by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/16/15. c/m to pro se plaintiffs. (Coleman, Laurie)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 283 Order Dismissing Parties: SO ORDERED that the claims of Fernando Cazares, Guillermo Torres, Keith Crews, Triandos C. Walker, Marc Jasmin and Keith Kendrick in this consolidated action are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Ru1es of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with R ule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S. C.§ 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Party Marc Jasmin, Keith Kendrick, Guillermo Torres, Triandos C. Walker, Fernando Cazares and Keith Crews terminated. CM to pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/19/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 252 ORDER: SO ORDERED that Fernando Cazares, Guillermo Torres, Keith Crews, Triandos C. Walker, Marc Jasmin and Keith Kendrick must each serve and file an affidavit on or before May 11, 2015 providing the Court with a new address and telephone number at which he can be contacted. THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PLAINTIFFS ARE ADVISED THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THAT PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVI L PROCEDURE. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules o f Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/6/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 149 OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 105 Motion to Compel. SO ORDERED that (1) the branches of the County defts' motions seeking dismissal of (a) all of Reid's Section 1983 claims, (b) the consolidated plaintiffs' Sect ion 1983 claims (i) against Sposato in his official capacity and (ii) alleging deliberate indifference to their medical needs, (c) Cazares's Section 1983 excessive force claim, and (d) the consolidated plaintiffs' state law claims for failu re to serve a notice of claim in accordance with New York General Municipal Law § 50-e are granted and those Section 1983 claims, and all state law claims of the consolidated plaintiffs, are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b )( 6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the County defts' motion is otherwise denied; and (2) the branch of Armor's motion seeking dismissal of the amended complaint against it for Jovany's, A. Torres's and G . Torres's failure to state a plausible Section 1983 claim of deliberate indifference to their medical needs is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Armor pursuant to Rule 12(b )(6) of the Fede ral Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim for relief. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court shall serve notice of entry of this order, as provided in Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, upon each party remaining in this action and record such service on the docket. CM to pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 8/20/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 94 Order: SO ORDERED that although the January 13, 2014 Order advised Wagner, Benloss and Cazares that a failure to comply therewith would result in their respective claims being dismissed in their entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rules 37(b)(2)(a)(v ) and 4l(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, they have not complied with that Order, moved for an extension of time to comply with that Order or taken any other steps to prosecute their respective claims. Accordingly, the claims of Wagner, Be nloss and Cazares in this consolidated action are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Party Daquan Wagner, Kevin Lee Benloss and Fernando Cazares terminated. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/9/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: SO ORDERED that Daquan Wagner, Kevin Lee Benloss, Fernando Cazares and Guillermo Torres must each serve and file an affidavit on or before February 18, 2014 providing the Court with a new address and telephone number at which he can be contac ted. THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PLAINTIFFS ARE ADVISED THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULES 37(b)(2)(A)(v) AND 41(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. The Clerk of the Court isdirected to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S. C.§ 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 1/13/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reid v. Nassau County Sheriff Dept. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nassau County Sheriff Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Sposato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwayne M. Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?