McCluskey v. Town of East Hampton et al
| John William McCluskey |
| Court of East Hampton Employees, Police Chief Larsen, Police Officer Nicholas Lloyd, Police Officer John Doe 1, Police Officer John Doe 2, Police Officer John Doe 3, Justice Lisa R. Rana, Richard H. Schneider, District Attorney Spotta, Town of East Hampton, Town of East Hampton Court, Village of East Hampton Police Department and Town Supervisor Wilkenson |
| 2:2013cv01248 |
| March 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION & ORDER denying 56 Motion for Reconsideration of 51 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 52 Judgment. SO ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is denied as untimely. In addition, plaintiff's argument that his case was dismissed while he was medically unable to return to the United States is unavailing because the underlying motion was fully briefed and thus his presence in the jurisdiction was unnecessary to a decision. Moreover, plaintiff has not identi fied any factual matters or controlling law which might be expected to alter the Order and accordingly, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. cm to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 6/23/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
