Pick Quick Foods, Inc. et al v. United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Pick Quick Foods, Inc. et al v. United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342

Pick Quick Foods, Inc. et al v. United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342

Petitioner:	Pick Quick Foods, Inc.
Respondent:	United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342
In Re:	For an Order Pursuant to Article 75 of the CPLR Staying Arbitration of A Certain Controversy
Case Number:	2:2013cv01391
Filed:	March 18, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge:	Gary R. Brown
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 10, 2013	Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and deferring ruling on in part 10 Motion to Dismiss, Vacate Stay and Compel Arbitration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants respondent's motion to vacate the stay and to co mpel arbitration. The Court will not make any determination on the pending motion to dismiss until the case has proceeded through arbitration. Accordingly, the parties are ordered to proceed to the Collective Bargaining Agreement's arbitration process. This action is stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/10/2013. (O'Donnell, Kaitlin)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 10, 2013

Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and deferring ruling on in part 10 Motion to Dismiss, Vacate Stay and Compel Arbitration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants respondent's motion to vacate the stay and to co mpel arbitration. The Court will not make any determination on the pending motion to dismiss until the case has proceeded through arbitration. Accordingly, the parties are ordered to proceed to the Collective Bargaining Agreement's arbitration process. This action is stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/10/2013. (O'Donnell, Kaitlin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pick Quick Foods, Inc. et al v. United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Pick Quick Foods, Inc.
Represented By:	Douglas Peter Catalano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United Food And Commericial Workers, Local 342
Represented By:	Ira D. Wincott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
In re: For an Order Pursuant to Article 75 of the CPLR Staying Arbitration of A Certain Controversy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?