Kernan et al v. New York State Department of Financial Services et al
James M. Kernan, Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company |
Eugene Benger, Edward R. Broton, Beth Cohen, Michael V. Imbriano, Benjamin M. Lawsky, Michael A. Mark, James Masterson, Howard D. Mills, III, New York State Department of Financial Services, Jon G. Rothblatt, Charles Buzz Sawyer, Jeffrey A. Stonehill and The United States of America |
2:2013cv03196 |
June 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Joanna Seybert |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 84 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motions to supplement the record on appeal (Docket Entries 84 and 98) are DENIED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/29/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 24 Motion for Leave to File; denying 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the State Defendants' motion to dismiss and Plainti ffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint are consequently DENIED AS MOOT. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint that provides a short and plain statement of their claims and that includes only simple, direct, a nd concise allegations within thirty (30) days of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiffs are warned that if the amended complaint does not comply with Rule 8, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to pro se Plaintiff Kernan. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/31/2014. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine) |
Filing 18 ORDER - Pending before the Court are: (1) pro se Plaintiff James M. Kernan's proposed Amended Complaint (Docket Entry 17) and (2) the State Defendants' letter requesting that their pending motion to dismiss be deemed unopposed (Docket Entry 13). The Court REJECTS Mr. Kernan's proposed Amended Complaint; the original Complaint shall remain the operative pleading. The Court, however, DENIES the State Defendants' request to deem their motion unopposed. Thus, in an ab undance of caution, the Court sua sponte GRANTS Plaintiffs an extension through September 23, 2013 to oppose the pending motion to dismiss. No further extensions of Plaintiffs' time to oppose will be granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Kernan. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/9/2013. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.