EDF Renewable Development, Inc. v. County of Suffolk
| EDF Renewable Development, Inc. |
| County of Suffolk |
| 2:2013cv03361 |
| June 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. For the reasons set forth in the attached Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Court holds that Plaintiff has prevailed in its action for breach of contract. After mitigation, and including statutory p rejudgment interest at 9%, the Court finds that EDF's total damages through April 30, 2016 are $10,475,091. In view of the fact that the damage calculation above includes prejudgment interest only through April 30, 2016, Plaintiff is d irected to submit a final judgment for review by this Court within two weeks of the date of these findings of fact and conclusions of law so that final judgment can be entered in this matter. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 11/17/2016. (Demosthenous, Dina)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER re 15 : see attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 5/28/2014. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
