Essani v. Earley et al
| Ahmed Essani |
| County of Suffolk, Harvey Crosby, Kevin J. Earley and Terence Nee |
| 2:2013cv03424 |
| June 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| William D. Wall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM and ORDER -- For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendants' (122) Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to(1)mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff and (2) enter judgment and close this case. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 4/22/2021. (Almonte, Kelly)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, I adopt the R&R as the opinion of this Court. As such, the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice as against the Estate. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the E state from this action and mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. Accordingly, his second request for an extension is denied. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 7/26/2019. (c/m to pro se) (Harvey Crosby, Cynthia Crafa and Nancy Western as Administrators of Harvey Crosby's Estate terminated.) (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, the Court: (1) denies the Estate's cross-motion to dismiss; (2) grants the Estate's request for an extension of the deadline to complete Plaintiff's deposition; and (3) grants Pla intiff's request to amend his complaint only to the extent Plaintiff seeks to add a request for attorney's fees and costs, but otherwise denies Plaintiff's motion to amend. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/28/2018. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re DE 64 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; DE 72 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; DE 68 First MOTION to Dismiss: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Report and Recommendation, t he Court respectfully recommends that the Estate's cross-motion to dismiss be denied. Further, Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is granted in part and denied in part, and the Estate's motion to extend the discovery deadline is gra nted. For the sake of clarity, the Court interprets the operative Complaint as asserting the following: (i) Claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County Defendants; (ii) State law claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the County Defendants; and (iii) State law claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the Estate. A status conference before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke is set for 9/12/2018 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 820 of the Central Islip courthouse. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 8/9/2018. c/m to pro se Plaintiff (Vissichelli, Eric)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting DE 55 , Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement: For the reasons detailed in the attached written order, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion to substitute the Estate for the deceased Crosby, and the caption shall be amended to reflect that substitution. Additionally, a status conference is hereby set for August 29, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. The Estate is directed to serve by mail a copy of this order on Plaintiff and file proof of service electronically with the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 8/9/2017. (Perri, Anthony)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
