Jung v. Kim et al
| Ki Dong Jung |
| International Leather Care Company Corp., Mal Soon Kim and Yeo Han Kim |
| 2:2013cv04020 |
| July 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| William D. Wall |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER terminating 78 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 81 Motion for Settlement; For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the parties' joint motion for settlement approval (Docket Entry 81). The parties are directed to either: (1 ) file a revised agreement on the public docket that contains a revised release and non-disparagement provision, and does not contain a counsel fee award exceeding one-third of the total settlement amount; or (2) file a letter indicating their intent to abandon their settlement and continue to litigate this action. The parties must take one of the above-mentioned actions within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Additionally, for the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Second Motion for Order to Show Cause (Docket Entry 78) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to TERMINATE Oscar G. Mori and Rudy Valdez as plaintiffs in this action as explained above. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/6/2017. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
