Edwards v. Destefano
Raheem Edwards |
Corporal Anderson, Officer Carpio, Corporal John Doe, Officer D.Stefano, Officer John Doe #2853, John Doe 2:13cv4345-d2, John Doe 2:13cv4345-d3, Edward P. Mangano, Sgt. McNamara, Sgt. O'Brien, Officer Pette, Officer Picolli and Michael Sposato |
2:2013cv04345 |
July 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joanna Seybert |
A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 139 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the stated reasons (Please See Order For Further Details), Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED, the R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/28/2023. (GO) |
Filing 70 ORDER. Defendants' motion 68 for a protective order is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendants are hereby directed to produce the IAU report -- redacted consistent with this order regarding other inmates' identifying i nformation and the enumerated identifying details of the corrections' officers -- to pro se Plaintiff and to file proof of service on ECF on or before February 11, 2022. The parties are hereby directed to execute and file an appropriately tailored confidentiality stipulation for this Court's approval on or before January 31, 2022. See attached Order 70 for further details. Defendants are hereby directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum Decision and Order on pro se Plaintiff and file proof of service on ECF on or before January 4, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 1/3/2022. (Weinstein, Tracy) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; For the reasons set forth above, the Complaint is sua sponte DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim as to Defendants Edward Mangano, Michael Sposato , John Doe of the Medical Staff, Officer Pette, and Grievance Officer John Doe. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. The Court requests that the Nassau County Attorney ascertain the name of the Defendant identified by the Plaintiff as Corporal John Doe employed at the Nassau County Correctional Center, who was involved in the incident described in the Complaint which is alleged to have occurred on April 19, 2013. This information is requested to be produced to the Plaintiff and to the Court within two (2) weeks from the date that this Memorandum and Order is served upon the Nassau County Attorney. Plaintiff's claims shall proceed against Defendants Stef ano, Officer John Doe #2853, McNamara, O'Brien, Carpio, Anderson, and Picolli. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue Summonses for Defendants Stefano, Officer John Doe #2853, McNamara, O'Brien, Carpio, Anderson, and Picolli and to for ward the Summonses and copies of the Complaint to the United States Marshal Service for service upon these Defendants without prepayment of the filing fee. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order wo uld not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/18/2013. C/M (Valle, Christine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.