Lavertu et al v. The Town of Huntington
| John Lavertu and Jennifer Lavertu |
| The Town of Huntington |
| 2:2013cv04378 |
| August 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| William D. Wall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is adopted in its entirety and plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Locke for discovery , to be completed by March 23,2015. Any dispositive motions are to be filed by May 25, 2015 and the pretrial conference in this matter is adjourned from April 2, 2015 to July 20, 2015 at 11:15 a.m.. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/24/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: SO ORDERED that the Report is adopted to the extent indicated and accordingly, deft's motion to dismiss this case on Monell grounds is denied. The motion is also denied with respect to plaintiffs' Equal Protection claim. The motion is granted for failure to state a claim as to plaintiffs' First Amendment Retaliation and Due Process claims and those claims are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 6/2/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
