De Oliveira v. Syneron, Inc. et al
| Tatiane Souza De Oliveira |
| Costa Tropical Beauty Spa, Inc., Rosagela Slomski and Syneron, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv05562 |
| October 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER - The Court now adopts Judge Lindsays January 13, 2016 Report and Recommendation in its entirety; denies the Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment; and dismisses the complaint as against the Defendants Costa Tropical Beauty Spa, Inc. and Ros agela Slomski, without prejudice. Further, on December 7, 2015, the Defendant Syneron filed a motion pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), seeking to dismiss the complaint as against it based on the Plaintiffs failure to prosecute. More than three months have passed and the Plaintiff has also not opposed this motion. Under Rule 41, the Court must consider several factors in determining whether a dismissal is warranted, including: (1) the duration of the plaintiffs failures or non-compliance; (2) whet her the plaintiff was on notice that the delay would result in dismissal; (3) whether the defendant is likely to be prejudiced by any further delay in the proceedings; (4) whether the courts interest in managing its docket outweighs the plaintiffs in terest in receiving an opportunity to be heard; and (5) whether a lesser sanction is available and would be effective. Applying this analytical framework, the Court is of the view that the Plaintiffs complete inaction over the course of more than two years; her disregard for the service obligations imposed by Judge Lindsays R&R; and her failure to oppose the pending motion to dismiss the complaint, require dismissal at this time. However, the Court notes that this dismissal is without prejudice and the Plaintiff is granted leave to replead within 30 days of the date of this Order.. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. See Order for further details. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/9/2016. c/ecf to Judgment Clerk. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
