75-07 Food Corp. et al v. Trustees of United Food and Commericial Workers Local 342 Health Care Fund et al
Nadine Food Corp., Kamal Corp., Loreen Food Corp.,, Coro Food Corp., 89-02 Food Corp., 130-10 Food Corp. and 75-07 Food Corp. |
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 342 Legal Fund, Trustees of United Food and Commericial Workers Local 342 Health Care Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 342 Safety, Education, Cultural and Activities Fund and United Food and Commercial Workers Local 342 Savings & 401(K) Plan |
2:2013cv05861 |
October 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants respondents' motion to compel arbitration, grants respondents' motion to vacate the temporary stay of arbitration ordered by the New York State Supreme Court, and stays this action. The parties are ordered to proceed to the arbitration process set forth in the Union Funds' Collection Procedures, which are binding on petitioners through the 2004 collective bargaining agreement. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 2/24/2014. (Gibaldi, Michael) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.