Burroughs et al v. County of Nassau et al
| Keith Addison, Craig Burroughs, William Cowan, Michael Dollison, Leo Duchnowski, Kevin Farrelly, Jerome Kowalski, Daniel Miller, Eddie Murdock, Ramel Nellums, Kurtis Phillip, James Sutherland, Craig Thurston, Gary Walsh and Jamel Williams |
| County of Nassau and Michael J. Sposato |
| 2:2013cv06784 |
| November 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| William D. Wall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER: Denying 146 Motion to Sever; and ORDER Granting 152 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. For the reasons set forth (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the motion to sever claims or separate trials is denied. The Court orders that defendants serve a copy of their motion to dismiss on all plaintiffs at their last known addresses and file an affidavit of service with the Court by January 22, 2016. If any plaintiff seeks to oppose the motion, such opposition must be filed with the Court no later than March 4, 2016. The Court has warned plaintiffs numerous times that failure to notify the Court of a change in address could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Therefore, to the extent no opposition is fil ed, defendants motion will be deemed unopposed. Defendants reply, if any, must be served and filed on March 18, 2016. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and the refore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 1/20/2016. c/m to all pro se litigants.(Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER denying 131 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff pro se's Motion to Compel is denied. Defendants shall serve pro se Plaintiffs with a copy of the attached Order, and electronically file proof of such service. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 7/14/2015. (Walsh, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' objections are OVERRULED and the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Wall's R&R in its entirety. Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore DENIED. Defendants' motion to strike is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/9/2014. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED. Plaintiffs' request to appoint a representative to sign papers filed with the Court is DENIED. The C ourt ORDERS expedited personal service of the Summonses, the Complaint, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the request for an Order to Show Cause, and this Order by the U.S. Marshal Service. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/17/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
