Jordan et al v. Tucker Albin and Associates, Incorporated et al
Edward Jordan and Kelly Jordan |
Mark Nash, RMS Industries, Inc., Reliance Mechanical Services, Inc., Speedy Lien, Inc., Tucker Albin and Associates, Incorporated and Jim Wilson |
2:2013cv06863 |
December 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joanna Seybert |
William D. Wall |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 177 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying DE 175 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/24/2019. (Kantor, Jesse) |
Filing 171 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying DE 161 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/6/2018. (Vissichelli, Eric) |
Filing 153 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the Court grants summary judgement on plaintiffs' claims for conversion, defamation, abuse of process, and violation of GBL § 349. The Court also grants summary judgment on plaintiff's FDCPA claims against the Speedy Lien defendants. The Court denies the remaining motions. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 5/19/2017. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.