Bentivegna v. People's United Bank et al
| Joanne Bentivegna |
| Dan Casey, People's United Bank, People's United Insurance Agency, Inc. and Louise Sandberg |
| 2:2014cv00599 |
| January 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER - For the above stated reasons, the Plaintiff's 84 motion for reconsideration is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the Court finds that questions of fact exist as to whether the Defendants can be held liable under a theory of retaliation for searching the Plaintiff's emails and commencing litigation against her. It is denied to the extent that the Court does not depart from its previous findings as to the other alleged materially adverse employment actions. The parties are directed to file a revised Joint Pretrial Order within ten days of the entry of this decision, and are further directed to appear before the Court on October 18, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1020 of the Long Island Courthouse. Counsel is to appear authorized to discuss settlement at that time. In the event that the matter is not settled, it will be adjourned for jury selection. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/25/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' 65 motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the following claims are dismissed: the Pla intiffs wage discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII, NYSHRL and EPA; the Plaintiff's NYLL wage claim; her breach of contract claim; and her unjust enrichment claim. It is denied to the extent that the following claims survive: the Plaintiff's hostile work environment claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL; the Plaintiffs termination discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL; and the Plaintiffs retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 8/7/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER granting 41 Motion to Dismiss; For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants the Plaintiff's Rule 12(b)(1) motion in its entirety and dismisses the Defendants' counterclaims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/21/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
