Levantino v. New York State Police et al
| Michael J. Levantino |
| New York State Police, NY State Police Investigator John Doe #2, NY State Police Investigator John Doe #1 and Keith M. Skala |
| 2:2014cv00974 |
| February 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - The Court denies as moot the 10 Rule 12(b)(6) motion by Skala and the State Police to dismiss the original complaint, and grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiffs 14 cross-motion to amend the complaint. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the New York State Police and John Doe #2 as Defendants, and add Brian Horgan in place of John Doe #1 as a defendant. The Plaintiff is directed to file a second amended complaint, with an amended caption, consistent with this Memorandum of Decision and Order within 10 days of the date of this order. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/3/2014. NY State Police Investigator John Doe #2 (in their official and individual capacity) and New York State Police terminated; Defendant Brian Horgan added in place of John Doe #1. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/3/2014. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
