Dixon v. United States of America

Dixon v. United States of America

Petitioner:	DeMark Dixon
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2014cv01223
Filed:	February 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joanna Seybert
Presiding Judge:	William D. Wall
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 14, 2018	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (Docket Entry 1) is DENIED and the Supplemental Petition is DENIED (Docket Entry 24). Because there can be no debate among reasonable jurists that Petitioner was not entitled to coram nobis relief, the Court does not issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also Middleton v. Attys Gen., 396 F.3d 207, 209 (2d Cir.2005). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Petitioner and mark this matter CLOSED. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/14/2018. c/m to pro se Petitioner. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 14, 2018

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (Docket Entry 1) is DENIED and the Supplemental Petition is DENIED (Docket Entry 24). Because there can be no debate among reasonable jurists that Petitioner was not entitled to coram nobis relief, the Court does not issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also Middleton v. Attys Gen., 396 F.3d 207, 209 (2d Cir.2005). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Petitioner and mark this matter CLOSED. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/14/2018. c/m to pro se Petitioner. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: DeMark Dixon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?