Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. et al
||Brian M. Jackson
||2:14cv2485 Does and Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.
||April 18, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Central Islip Office
||Arthur D. Spatt
||A. Kathleen Tomlinson
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 17, 2015
DECISION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court treats CCLs motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the original complaint as against it as directed to the second amended complaint. The Court grants that motion and the second amended complaint is dismissed as against CCL without prejudice to replead agency liability under the TCPA. If, within 14 days of the date of this order, the Plaintiff fails to do so, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate CCL as a defendan t. Finally, the Court sua sponte has considered whether to certify certain portions of this Decision and Order for an interlocutory appeal to CCL under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and, even if it had such authority on this procedural posture, declines to do so. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate docket entries 18, 19, and 20. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/17/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)
|November 19, 2014
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Discovery. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 11/19/2014. (Kandel, Erin)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?